sábado, 25 de marzo de 2017

Colorado Youth Score Decisive Legal Victory Against Fracking Industry



Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, youth plaintiff, leads a youth rally on the west steps of the Colorado Capitol Building on February 20, 2017 in Denver, Colorado.  (Photo: Helen Richardson/ Denver Post)



Common Dreams        
By Lauren McCauley
March 24, 2017


Three-judge appeals court panel ruled that state law requires that human health and environment take precedence over industry interests

A group of Colorado teenagers scored a "huge" victory against the state's fracking industry on Thursday when a three-judge panel ruled that the health of citizens and environment takes precedence over oil and gas interests.

The decision, handed down by the Colorado Court of Appeals on Thursday, requires that the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) consider a petition from six youth plaintiffs, which asks the board to suspend the issuance of fracking permits "until it can be done without adversely impacting human health and safety and without impairing Colorado's atmospheric resource and climate system, water, soil, wildlife, and other biological resources."

Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, 16-year-old plaintiff and youth director of the Boulder-based Earth Guardians, declared after the ruling: "Our movement to fight for the rights of people and our environment is evolving. From the streets to the courtroom, the voices of the younger generation will be heard, and the legal system is a tool for our resistance. Small wins build up to create massive change."

Martinez and his brother Itzcuahtli Roske-Martinez are joined on the petition by Sonora Brinkley, Aerielle Deering, Trinity Carter, and Emma Bray, who are all members of the young activist group. Their ages currently range from 13 to 16.

The COGCC had rejected the petition (pdf) in 2014 after claiming that state law requires the government to strike a "balance" between fossil fuel development and public health. That interpretation was upheld by the Denver District Court.

On Thursday, however, the three-judge, all-woman panel said the Commission "erred" in its interpretation of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act, finding instead that the law "mandates that the development of oil and gas in Colorado be regulated subject to the protection of public health, safety, and welfare, including protection of the environment and wildlife resources."...




To access the COMPLETE news,





No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario